Lineage cold-chain results: trucking squeeze hits the transport arm
Lineage’s warehouses are filling slowly. Its trucks are costing it money. Lineage, the world’s largest operator of temperature-controlled warehouses, said on 9 November that its third-quarter AFFO fell 14.9% to $188m, or $0.73 a share. AFFO (adjusted funds from operations) is the cash-earnings measure that property companies such as REITs (real estate investment trusts) report in place of normal profit. Revenue fell 1.2% to $1,361m. The net loss widened to $173m, or $0.68 a share, from $112m a year earlier. Adjusted EBITDA, a measure of operating earnings before interest, tax and depreciation, fell 7.0% to $317m. The margin narrowed by 150 basis points to 23.3%.
Our view: read this as a refrigerated trucking story, not a cold-storage collapse. The warehouses are slowly filling. Most of the damage sits in the part of Lineage that buys and runs road transport. That is the same squeeze forwarders feel every time they book a reefer (refrigerated truck or container) for a food or pharma load.
Where the money went
Lineage reports two segments. Global Warehousing is the buildings: storing, freezing, handling and moving pallets in and out. Global Integrated Solutions is everything around them, including transport and other value-added services.
Get The Freight Brief by email
What's going on in freight, in your inbox every morning. Free.
The warehouse side held up. Segment revenue was $1,009m, down 0.4%. Net operating income, or NOI (revenue minus the direct cost of running the business), fell 6.0% to $361m. The margin dropped 210 basis points to 35.8%. That is a real decline, but on almost unchanged sales.
The integrated solutions side was worse. Revenue fell 3.3% to $352m. NOI fell 13.8% to $56m. The margin dropped 200 basis points to 15.9%. It is also getting worse. In the second quarter, reported on 5 August, the same segment’s NOI fell 10.3% to $61m and its margin fell 80 basis points to 17.1%. So the margin decline in Q3 was more than twice as steep as in Q2.
The company itself ties the problem to transport costs. Chief executive Greg Lehmkuhl said “sharply higher oil prices, constrained trucking capacity, and tariff uncertainty created temporary headwinds”. He said they fell “particularly in our Global Integrated Solutions business.” In August, his comments on the second quarter did not mention oil or trucking at all. He called that quarter “a solid second quarter, with adjusted EBITDA and AFFO per share both ahead of expectations.” So within one quarter, road freight and fuel went from absent in his remarks to the headline problem.
The wider income statement shows how thin the cushion has become. Lineage’s operating result swung to a loss of $80m in the quarter, from a profit of $35m a year earlier. Our reading is that this leaves little room to absorb another quarter of rising transport costs without the hit showing up in cash earnings too.
It also matters which way the two segments are moving relative to each other. Integrated solutions makes up about a quarter of Lineage’s revenue, at $352m out of $1,361m. Yet its NOI fell more than twice as fast as the warehouse segment’s in percentage terms. A business that resells and runs trucking around its warehouses earns a thinner margin to begin with. When the cost of a truck rises faster than the price it can charge the customer, that margin shrinks quickly. This is the same problem a forwarder faces when it quotes a delivered price and then has to buy the truck at a higher rate.
The warehouses are filling, slowly
The occupancy numbers matter most for anyone storing chilled or frozen cargo. Lineage reports two kinds. Economic occupancy counts the pallet positions customers pay for, including space they have committed to but may not be using. Physical occupancy counts pallets actually sitting in the racks.
On a same-warehouse basis (buildings it ran in both years), economic occupancy rose to 82.5% from 82.2%. Physical occupancy rose to 76.2% from 75.1%. Lehmkuhl pointed to “same-store occupancy growing year-over-year for the second consecutive quarter”. In August he had called the Q2 gain in physical occupancy “a positive signal that inventory levels have further normalized and that the industry is stabilizing.”
We agree it is stabilising, but slowly. Throughput, the number of pallets moving in and out of the same warehouses, fell 1.1% to 12.334 million. Inventory is sitting a little longer and moving a little less. That fits a market where food importers and processors are cautious about how much stock to bring in while tariff rates keep shifting. On these figures, about a quarter of Lineage’s same-warehouse pallet positions hold no physical pallet.
What the guidance change tells you
Lehmkuhl said: “We expect these pressures to continue into the fourth quarter and have adjusted our guidance accordingly”. Lineage now expects full-year adjusted EBITDA of $1.25bn to $1.27bn. In August the range was $1.26bn to $1.29bn. The midpoint has fallen by $15m.
The AFFO-per-share range moved less than you might expect. It is now $2.86 to $2.98, against $2.80 to $3.05 in August. The midpoint is almost unchanged, and the range is narrower. Our reading: the company is confident about its cash costs and dividend cover, but less confident about operating earnings. The quarterly dividend stays at $0.5325 a share.
The arithmetic for the last quarter is worth doing. Adjusted EBITDA was $634m for the first half (from the August release) plus $317m in Q3, so $951m for nine months. A full-year range of $1.25bn to $1.27bn therefore implies about $299m to $319m for the fourth quarter. The bottom of that range would be the weakest quarter of the year. Similarly, AFFO per share of $1.55 in the first half plus $0.73 in Q3 is about $2.28 for nine months. That implies roughly $0.58 to $0.70 a share in Q4, below Q3’s $0.73 even at the top end. Lineage is guiding for a softer fourth quarter, not a recovery.
Lehmkuhl’s own framing is that “we view them as cyclical rather than a change in our trajectory”. That may prove right over a year or two. But the guidance shows the company does not expect the cycle to turn before December.
The reefer market behind the numbers
Lineage’s complaint about trucks lines up with the spot market. A DAT weekly report carried by AJOT on 19 October, covering 10–16 October, put the national reefer spot rate at $3.66 a mile, including fuel. The reefer linehaul rate, which excludes fuel, was $2.76 a mile. That was 33% above the same point last year, or 68 cents a mile higher. The reefer load-to-truck ratio, the number of loads posted for every truck available, was 15.8. The report’s summary was blunt: “Capacity remains the key factor in pricing.”
The same report noted that “lower diesel prices shaved 3 to 4 cents a mile off the average fuel surcharge” that week. So fuel was easing slightly in October. But the linehaul rate is about trucks and drivers, not fuel. A 33% rise in linehaul is a capacity problem, and capacity problems do not fix themselves in a few weeks.
That is the key point for forwarders. If the world’s largest cold-chain operator, with its buying power and its own transport network, cannot protect its transport margin, a mid-sized forwarder buying reefer trucks one load at a time will struggle even more.
What it means for forwarders and shippers
First, quote refrigerated inland legs on short validity. Haulage from port to cold store, and from cold store to the customer’s distribution centre, is where costs are rising fastest. A quote that holds for 30 days in this market carries real risk. Index-linked fuel surcharges help, but they do not cover a linehaul rate that is a third higher than last year.
Second, use the spare storage. Physical occupancy of 76.2% means warehouse operators want pallets. Importers of frozen meat, seafood, fruit and dairy have more leverage on storage rates, minimum volume commitments and free-time terms than they had in the tight years after 2021. Forwarders that bundle storage with ocean or air freight should push for better rates now, while operators are chasing volume.
Third, watch the gap between storage and transport. The two halves of the cold chain are moving in opposite directions. Storage is getting cheaper to negotiate, and trucking is getting dearer. Total landed cost for a reefer box may not change much. Where the cost sits will change, and that matters for who carries the risk under each contract.
Fourth, plan around tariff timing. Lehmkuhl named “tariff uncertainty” as a headwind. Flat throughput and slowly rising occupancy suggest importers are staggering orders rather than building stock ahead of rate changes. That makes cold-store intake lumpier. Lumpier intake usually means more short-notice trucking demand, which is the most expensive kind.
Our call
We expect the trucking squeeze to outlast the quarter. When Lineage reports fourth-quarter results in early 2027, we predict Global Integrated Solutions NOI will again be lower than a year earlier. We also predict same-warehouse physical occupancy will stay below 78%. That would mean cold storage stays a buyer’s market and refrigerated trucking stays a seller’s market through at least the end of Q1 2027. Forwarders should price their cold-chain business on that basis.
Sources
Get The Freight Brief by email
What's going on in freight, in your inbox every morning. Free.
Read us on Google? Add Forwarder News as a preferred source to see more of our stories in Top Stories.